Misc. Hinky Meter (by Valhall) Blog Entries

Zenaida? Benhaida? George the Gigolo?

Posted on March 12th, 2010 by Valhall

Huh?

http://www.wftv.com/news/22825765/detail.html

So George’s description of Zenaida closely matches a woman who claims to have had an affair with George? And George’s chippie has a sister with a last name Benhaida?

Benhaida-fo-faida-fee-fi-fo-faida-Zenaida?

And George allegedly took her for $5000 while they were screwing around? And he had other chippies, and he took them for money as well?

George is a gigolo?

WTF?

Valhall.

http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1985

•Characterization of Anthony Family Relationships
•Characterization of Casey as liar
•Hearsay
•Contents of Trunk
•Double (dammit) Hearsay
•Characterization of Casey as bad mother
•Characterization of Casey as thief
•Remains of Caylee
•Jesse (Grund) as father of Caylee
•Casey pregnancy
•Roy Kronk tip
•Characterization of Casey as drug user
•Characterization of Casey as frequent partier
•Hearsay (psychic) – (which must be a special subset of double dammit hearsay when a psychic is involved)
•Casey stealing (versus Casey being characterized as thief?)
•Casey’s second pregnancy
•Finding of Caylee Remains

So Baez is taking out everything there is to talk about except what Casey swore to in that note she wrote last year where she claimed the only thing she agreed to was that she left Caylee with a nanny and never saw her again?

Did you all see that note? I'll try to find it. Casey didn't even give any details about how she left Caylee with the nanny or where etc. as if she were retracting everything and just going with how she left Caylee with the nanny (no name given) and never saw her again. That was IT in a nut shell!

So if Baez goes on just that statement of Casey's that HE got her to write last year, no wonder he wants everything else omitted.

LottieM~ I think he's just 'throwin spagetti at the wall to see what sticks" I also think he is trying to divert attention from the issue of who exactly has paid his salary for the last 1+ years....... and an ethics investigation if he brokered a media deal- a conflict of interest for any attorney - Now, if Jose had gotten a third party (attorney) involved to broker that deal on behalf of his client, an unaffiliated attorney to protect Casey's best interest and manage the assets, that would be another thing altogether. But he didn't. JMO. kh

PS: I am totally blown away by Vall's blog. kh

Check this out from Val's blog! Joy Wray, another criminal who loves the Anthonys!

5/31/98 – Fraudulent use of credit cards – adjudicated guilty
- Expired or revoked credit cards – adjudication withheld
- theft, obtaining credit cards through fraudulent means – reduced to theft – adjudication withheld
7/5/98 - trespassing – adjudicated guilty
7/7/98 - trespassing – adjudicated guilty
7/8/98 - trespassing – adjudicated guilty
9/4/98 - Battery – adjudicated guilty
- Battery – adjudicated guilty
9/26/98 – Burglary – reduced to criminal mischief – adjudicated guilty
10/07/98- criminal mischief – adjudicated guilty
10/20/98- charged with criminal mischief – disposition unknown
- trespassing – adjudicated guilty
- theft – adjudicated guilty
11/13/98- theft – adjudicated guilty

She seems to have settled down for almost a year after this. Maybe someone back in her past who actually cared about her got her some help. But a year was all she could make.

11/22/99- breach of peace, disorderly conduct – adjudicated guilty
- battery – adjudicated guilty
- obstructing justice, resisting officer – adjudicated guilty

After that she had about a year and a half that she laid low and stayed out of trouble (as far as law enforcement could tell). But then, in 2001, she rose to the surface (or sank to the bottom) again.

7/17/01 - retail theft – adjudicated guilty
10/8/01 - stalking – dropped/abandoned
11/6/01 - violation of a protective order, domestic violence – adjudicated guilty

http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1108

ETA: Sorry, this was already posted in the Joy Wray thread!

http://www.realitychatter.com/caylee-anthony-f14/joy-wray-to-be-questioned-by-ocso-t1517-20.htm

thanks piper! 8)

i know i am a little late on this.... got finals this week... but i am seriously about the gloria squared!!

that article/theory was HILARIOUS!!!

Lottie, check out this older thread here on RC in regards to Ms. Joy Wray....interesting videos

http://www.realitychatter.com/caylee-anthony-f14/joy-wray-to-be-questioned-by-ocso-t1517.htm

thanks Piper! I got too excited and didn't go looking for a thread about Joy.

Well, it wasn't labeled Joy Wray! Did you check out Joy's video's?

Piper wrote:Well, it wasn't labeled Joy Wray! Did you check out Joy's video's?

Oh! well, I'm a lamer than I thought today! LOL

I haven't watched it yet. Every time I sit down here to play someone here wants something, like food or some other nonsense. :)

Joy's video's are disturbing...to say the least!!

LottieM wrote:

Piper wrote:Well, it wasn't labeled Joy Wray! Did you check out Joy's video's?

Oh! well, I'm a lamer than I thought today! LOL

I haven't watched it yet. Every time I sit down here to play someone here wants something, like food or some other nonsense. :)

That happens to me too. The nerve of some people, huh?
That's why I stay up so late at night. They are all sleeping, hahahaha.
But then I oversleep in the morning and hubby comes in the room and says "It's 6:30!" He knows I set my alarm for 6:00. And I casually say back to him "I'm up!" like can't you see, I am wide awake, and just laying here for no reason, but I am wide awake, I did not fall back to sleep! Now go away, LOL.

6 o'clock?! Oh you poor thing! I'd die if I had to wake up that early. And my hubby would die if he talked to me before I've had 2 cups of coffee no matter what time it is! LOL

Note to self: Never watch Joy Wray videos before breakfast! She's too crazy! I can't believe the defense wants her as a witness!

Isn't she a nutcase, Lottie? At one time she had some even stranger videos on Youtube with her kids in the background. She's taken them all down.

Lottie- LOL.
If I don't get up at 6, the kids will all have a day off from school.

Revisiting the Water Level Issue

Posted on March 23rd, 2010 by Valhall

As those who follow my blog well know, I have had issues about the water level at Suburban. Namely, my issues have centered around the discrepancy between eye witness accounts of the water level in August, 2008, and the report issued by Dr. Jawitz. My concerns have been two-fold: 1. I am concerned at the validity of the methodology and assumption in Dr. Jawitz’s report, and 2. I feared the location marked in the photographs at the end of Dr. Jawitz’s report appeared to be too close to Suburban Drive compared to the area marked on the topography maps at “Area A”.

I have detailed these concerns in three articles here at The Hinky Meter. Namely, Rainfall Analysis for Conditions on August 11, 2008; Rainfall Analysis for Conditions on September 1st, 2008; and Analyzing the Analysis: The Waterlevel Report. Now, the first two of these articles was what I want to call a “brute force” analysis of my own in which I made clear that I was not asserting that what I presented was the actual conditions at the location, but an estimate based on assumptions. The reason I wanted to be clear on that is that there are a lot of unknowns that to this date I do not have answers to. These analyses were based on the limited data we have from the topography map included in the OCSO report of the distribution of the remains in the swamp area along Suburban Drive. Because I did not have full topography data I could not tell if the area drained to a subsequent location south of where the remains were located. But, based on the limited topography data, I felt that it was a good approximation until data contradictory to it was presented.

The last article in that series was a review of Dr. Jawitz’s report commissioned by the state of Florida. In that article I questioned some things about the report. First, the methodology of assuming that the water level of the immediate area where the remains were located could be tied back to the water level of the Little Econ river via a monitoring well located further to the south to southeast of the remains. Second, the location of where the marker was photographed at the end of Dr. Jawitz’s report, because it appeared to be too close to Suburban compared to the location designated on the topography map.

Read more:
http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/03/23/revisiting-the-water-level-issue/

Linda Tinelli’s interview: A Few very strange Questions

Posted on April 5th, 2010 by Valhall

Linda Tinelli was interviewed by OCSO on December 14, 2009. Linda became involved with the Anthonys by volunteering to man the Kid Finders’ command center tents. She states Holly Gagne asked her to continue to assist with those command centers. While Linda doesn’t really have any earth-shattering information to provide, the questions asked of her by OCSO are very interesting, and appear to give insight into information law enforcement was made privy to during their investigation. I would like to center on the very strange questions Sergeant John Allen and Corporal Eric Edwards asked Linda. John Allen and Corporal Edwards are apparently reading these questions from emails or other types of documents they have in their possession.

1. Did he [Dominic Casey] ever and I’m looking through some emails that ah, email exchanges between Dominic and other people, who are helping him in regards to this investigation. Did he ever talk to you about hitting the big..let me read from here. “The big boys and girls at the top of the trafficking escort Medicaid fraud scheme..scheme and ah, these people be, these people singing.”?

2. Did he ever talk to you about Casey enjoying a lifetime club and getting in too deep and having to um, to get out of this lifetime club. Ah, and get herself into protective custody?

Read more: http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/04/05/linda-tinellis-interview-a-few-very-strange-questions/

I found this link at Hinky:

Jail telephone recordings of Anthony pen pal released

Updated: Thursday, 08 Apr 2010, 10:01 PM EDT
Published : Thursday, 08 Apr 2010, 9:43 PM EDT

ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. (WOFL FOX 35) - It’s perhaps a rare look inside the mind of Casey Anthony, as interpreted by a jail pen pal.

FOX 35 has obtained audio recordings in which inmate Robyn Adams talks to family and friends from behind bars about Anthony and conversations with the 24 year old accused of murdering her daughter, Caylee Marie.

LISTEN TO JAIL RECORDINGS TO THE RIGHT>>>

There are roughly 800 calls recorded between Adams and others, dating back to July of 2008. It's what happened after Casey Anthony was booked in the Orange County Jail that will have you talking.

Let's go back to December 11, 2008. That was the day Casey was told a meter reader found her daughter's body in the woods near her parents’ home.

Casey Anthony jail letters released >>>

What was jail guard's role in Anthony's letter exchange>>>

Inmates: Anthony would drug daughter for sleep >>>

Adams told investigators that Casey cried and she was “very scared" that day.
“She doesn't seem to be looking good,” Adams says in one recording in a conversation with another woman. “I'm praying for her everyday."

Once it was revealed to Adams by her friend that some of the items found at the crime scene were traced back to her parents home, Adams says, “I had a feeling it might be. Well nevertheless, it's not my place to judge her."

Adams goes on to say, “I just want there to be a peace, you know? Whatever the case may be whatever she is guilty or not guilty of."

http://www.myfoxorlando.com/dpp/news/orange_news/040810-Phone-calls-of-Anthony-pen-pal-released

When an Angel Pees down your Touch-hole

Posted on April 20th, 2010 by Valhall

There is an old German proverb…

All skill is in vain when an angel pees down the touch-hole of your musket.

It is said to have been modified and used on the battlefields of the American Civil War in the form of “don’t let an angel pee down your touch-hole”. Now, to be clear on the meaning here, the touch-hole in a muzzle-loading musket is the vent hole through which the spark ignites the charge packed into the gun. And you can be the best marksman with a muzzle-loading musket in the world, but if your target’s angel pees in your touch-hole, you better just praise God and pass the ammunition on to someone else – because you’re out of the fight.

In my personal opinion, what we have seen happen in the past few days and culminating yesterday with Judge Stickland’s resignation as presiding Judge over the Caylee Marie Anthony murder trial, has been some type of God-sent mystery – we’ve watched SOMEONE’S angel pee in SOMEONE’S touch-hole. And it is my personal opinion that someone’s angel was Judge Strickland’s…and that SOMEONE’s touch-hole was Cheney Mason’s and Casey Anthony’s.

Read more: http://www.thehinkymeter.com/

And just maybe Raymond Burr is the "angel" in this case...since it has turned into a Perry/Mason episode...

The Crystal Light bottle – Chemical Analysis

Posted on April 24th, 2010 by Valhall

Original article posted on November 11, 2009

There’s been a significant amount of discussion on the net about the chemical analysis of the Crystal Light bottle found in the trash bag of Casey’s trunk. It appears in the past couple of days the talk has turned to pesticides being present in the bottle. This particular bottle is the small-mouthed Crystal Light bottle, with the blue top, and a small amount of “brown” looking fluid in it as seen in the following two pictures.



(Photos courtesy of WFTV)

Initially the rumors about the Crystal Light bottle centered around it being urine (because of the description listed of it smelling as such), so let’s look at this claim. The first thing we need to do is pull together the data from the various tables and test results through-out the mega-document released on Friday.

For the table on 913 we have:

Dark yellowish liquid
Odor consistent with urine
Water
No chloroform

For the table on 940 we have:

Methanol (MeOH)
Methyl ethyl ketone
2-Butanol
Dimethyl disulfide
Anisole
p-Cresol

From the test results for HS-GC-MSD on pages 996 to 1010 we have:

Methyl isocyanide
2-Butanone
Trimethylamine
1-Methoxycycloheptratriene
Phenol
Cyclohexane
Benzothiazole
2-Nonanol, 5-ethyl-

The first thing I noticed about this list was that it was, for the most part, solvents. Some of these are also used as propellants in aerosol spray products. The Triethylamine was the most likely culprit for the “urine smell”. Not looking over any concentrations, it seemed like a weird brew to have in a bottle in your car (even if it was in the trash). But it definitely wasn’t urine – not unless some one is drinking MEK and tinkling solvents (not to mention it would be rather difficult for Casey to pee into a small-mouthed bottle). It was easy to dismiss that idea pretty quickly.

Read the rest:
http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/04/24/the-crystal-light-bottle/

i always thought that it looked like a nasty old spit cup... but i am no chemist, just from WV, and we, unfortunately see a LOT of disgusting old spit tunes here....

The Backpack

Posted on April 26th, 2010 by Valhall

There are a few statements in Cindy Anthony’s August 4th, 2008 interview with OCSO that I’d like to discuss. With us being almost 2 years into Caylee’s death, there are no real eureka moments left, but revisiting these statements in one place even though they have been discussed in various places at different times will further some good discussion, I’m sure. So with that, I’ll start with Cindy’s statements about Caylee’s backpack.

Beginning at the bottom of page 19 of the linked pdf Cindy begins to describe the contents of Caylee’s Dora the Explorer backpack which was in the Pontiac when the car was recovered from Johnson’s impound lot. It would be more accurate to state she begins to describe the lack of contents of the backpack. Cindy explains that when she retrieved the backpack from the backseat of Casey’s car the only things in it were…

…a couple of diapers in there, her toothbrush, a couple hair things. And then maybe some wipes and that was it.

Cindy’s statement here about the contents of the backpack remains fairly consistent all the way through her July 28th, 2009 deposition with the State Attorney. In that deposition, beginning at the bottom of page 154 of the linked pdf, Cindy states the contents of the backpack were…

…baby wipes…a few Pull-Ups in there, her toothbrush, a comb and maybe some hair bows or something in there.

So we have one of those rare moments in this case where the story actually remains the same for the time being.

Read the rest:
http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/04/26/the-backpack/

That was a good post of Val's. Very thought provoking!

Provoked thoughts:

I wonder if LE ever found the stuff Caylee had at the Nursing home on the 15th (the book etc) in the Anthony home?

Seems like pretty much everything Cindy would have taken with her in Caylee's backpack that day (such as a change of clothes) would have been left in the bag after she got home. I can see her removing any snacks etc, but why take out a change of clothes? And what about the book? where is that book?

I thought George said he saw Caylee leave with her backpack that had monkeys on it. Is that the same one as the Dora one?

Too bad we don't see Caylee's backpack lying around in that video from the Nursing Home.

my guess on the monkey backpack is that it is the same as the stated dora backpack..

i havent seen it since my bitty was little, but wasnt dora's #1 cohort BOOTS?? he is a monkey.

Relevant Photos

Posted on May 12th, 2010 by Valhall

Yesterday’s hearing involved the testimony of a law professor from New Mexico by the name of Elizabeth Rapaport. Ms. Rapaport had been called to the stand by defense attorney Andrea Lyon whose number one priority is to get the death penalty off the table in the state’s prosecution of Casey for the murder of Caylee Marie Anthony. During this testimony, and in the follow up arguments presented by Ms. Lyon and Mr. Ashton, much was said about the pictures of Casey Anthony taken on June 20th, 2008 at Fusion night club.

These pictures are the infamous “blue dress” pictures showing Casey doing her bump and grind with another woman, on stage, during some type of hot body contest, or simply because she was crap-faced drunk. In the hearing on Monday state attorney Linda Drane-Burdick had referred to these pictures as those depicting a “scantily clad” defendant. Ms. Lyon attempted to twist those words stated by Ms. Burdick to show that the state is wanting to “put her client to death” because she led an unconventional, or in the words of the witness Ms. Rapaport “deviant”, lifestyle. Ms. Lyon’s argument was that this was a case of sexist, gender-based discrimination that leads to death penalties against women due to social activities that could be cast as “immoral”. Ms. Lyon, and her witness Ms. Rapaport, contended that an immoral lifestyle does not a murderer make. Much like Cindy contends a liar does not a criminal make.

Read more: http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/05/12/relevant-photos/

I have to wonder why Casey even bothered saying she was looking for Caylee. All she really had to say was Caylee was fine with Zanny and she had no reason to go looking for her. I mean, really! How stupid is she that she'd say she was out looking high and low for Caylee while KNOWING there was evidence that she was absolutely NOT doing that at all and was partying (and making plans to party) like no tomorrow?

All her behavior shows she had not a care in world about how Caylee was faring. She could have just said Zanny had Caylee for the summer. And that is pretty much what she held to until Cindy got Lee over to the house to 'break' Casey.

But why did Casey break? And change her entire story on July 15th when up until then she was living a life that fit with her story that Caylee was fine and living it up with Zanny? Now her story doesn't fit with her actions. How dumb do you have to be to swap stories like that? She must have thought it was a good idea. Did she forget or not realize they'd find out what she was really doing once the cops got involved?

All she had to do was keep saying all was well. The cops then would have to demand Casey produce the child as proof all was well, but only so long as there was a complaint of concern that she was not...such as Cindy's concern over not seeing Caylee and being given the runaround.

But Cindy could also have complained that none of Caylee's things were missing and none of her things were found in Casey's possession at Tony's or otherwise. All very suspicious when added to not seeing her and being given the runaround for a month. But she didn't! She used only that she had not seen Caylee and Casey wouldn't tell her where she was, and then finally she used the car smelling like death!

Now the story was on a different angle from even kidnapping! Someone was probably dead! And that someone was likely Caylee!

So in a matter of hours, Cindy goes from wanting to know where Caylee is, to telling the cops Casey admitted to a kidnapping, to the introduction of a death! And all these hours Cindy has had knowledge the car smelled of a dead body, yet she saved it for a last resort (as she said she only told the cops that to get them over there faster, but didn't really think it was a death, just pizza).

After Cindy provides the death smell info, she takes it back immediately! And wants to keep on with the kidnap story. How stupid is Cindy? The kidnap story is shot full of holes!

I guess what I'm trying to say is, for a month Casey talked and acted like nothing was wrong in the nanny having Caylee. If she had refused to go off with Cindy on July 15th and held to her story, what outcome would we be looking at? Would Cindy have called 911 without Casey being in the car? If she had done that then the cops would have been first on the scene at Tony's to interrogate Casey. This is clearly NOT what Cindy wanted to happen. Why not?

IMO because it was necessary to get the entire family on board with an excuse for Caylee being gone other than the smell in the car and for Lee to go over and 'do a few things' at Tony's for a few hours absent the police.

Cindy was clearly covering from at least the time she smelled the car! And she used Amy to pretend she had no idea where to find Casey. Now why would she do that - pretend to not know where Casey was, you ask? IMO, so she could pretend not to have known anything prior to July 15th! But IMO, she did know at least by the time she wrote her myspace entry July 3 that her Caylee was MISSING! That was,IMO, a set up for the future kidnap story just in case it became necessary to explain where Caylee was to inquiring/suspicious others.

George was near the car on June 24th, according to him. He would have HAD to notice the smell of death! And he would have told Cindy! Coincidentally a couple days later the car gets abandoned and it's no secret Casey left it there...nothing to hide...and Cindy comes up with the suggestion that someone must have put a dead body in the car while it was in the tow yard!

Family conspiracy 101! And I can't forget Casey saying how she was given a script to follow for 30 days, where to go and what to say etc and not to call the cops or her family could be in danger! Well, duh...the whole family could be in danger!.... of being arrested for hiding Caylee's death! And for all we know, a blame game over who did it!

Casey left home for good on June 18th! No more computer activity from there for her after that. No more lengthy phone calls from there suggesting she was hanging out there. 30 days is enough time for Caylee's remains to be completely skeletal. Coincidence? I don't think so.

Casey abandons her car just in time for being able to use Tony's and then Amy's to finish out her 30 days of freedom. Cindy and George don't 'find' the car in a timely fashion, but do just in time for Amy to return and 'tell them' where Casey is. Coincidence? I don't think so!

Casey says Caylee had been gone for 31 days. She was obviously counting! Counting the 30 day script? WTH? Was Cindy late? Or did Casey start from the wrong date? Like from the date she killed Caylee rather than the date the script was made up? OR did Casey not realize June only had 30 days and added in one extra day? Better yet, was Cindy counting wrong and made a major gaff by saying June 9th when technically they should have received notice of the car being towed by July 9th, thus making it....once again, 30 days before calling the cops.

I'm very sure both Casey and Cindy were quite nervous about calling 911 that day. And both being so manipulative, it was hard to keep the story in tact between the two, therefore much happened that makes no sense!

And something else that makes no sense is that Cindy and George are NOT concerned about Casey partying while Caylee was gone! Probably part of what the script said to do.

Concerning the “Junk Science” Argument against Vass’s Work

Posted on June 2nd, 2010 by Valhall

Yesterday’s hearing was like a whole a lot of cold leftover stew with just a bit of meat remaining. The majority of the hearing can best be described using Judge Perry’s words…it was one attempt after another by the defense to get a “second bite of the apple” as they attempted to get motions previously ruled on by Judge Strickland ruled on again by Judge Perry. Unless I missed something by dozing off in between the bumbling and stuttering, I believe Judge Perry denied the motion for reconsideration on each of the motions heard.

So let’s get to what may have been the only meat in the matter, and that is the argument presented by Baez that is actually one of the first presentations toward the defense’s only strategy that has hope of making progress – the attack on the forensic science in the case. Baez argued for the Supplemental Motion to Compel filed by Lindy Kenny Baden on May 18th. This motion is one in a list of several Baden has filed attempting to get everything from funding sources to bench notes to CV’s and to infinity concerning ORNL (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) where Dr. Vass works, as well as the FBI laboratory. In this latest motion Ms. Baden included via references all the other previous motions she has filed with the long lists of information she wants.

To be clear on what Ms. Baden is up to, this is, in fact, a phishing expedition. She is attempting to gather information on both of these institutes, where their money comes from, the people working there, and the processes employed connected with the Casey Anthony case to find any weak link she can exploit in court to cast doubt in the jurors’ minds about the veracity of the results coming from either or both sources. Her goal is to attack either with gusto or tenuous arguments, depending on what she can dig up in these phishing activities, any point she can make in front of the jury in order to make those jurors doubt, in some manner, the science being presented to them.

I was amazed that Baden was not there to argue this motion, but left it to Baez for presentation.

So let’s look at what Baez bobble-headed his way through in this particular argument. As has been heard several times in the past almost 2 years, the discussion turned to whether the work performed by ORNL, specifically by Dr. Arpad Vass, concerning detection of decompositional gases as well as the analysis of the gases present as a means to estimate PMI, would require a Frye hearing. In this argument Baez also held up a publication by The National Science Academy which was a Congressionally commissioned work entitled Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward. When Baez held this publication up he stated they had included it as an addendum to their motion because its finding pointed to the problems in modern forensic science and what needed to be corrected.

In order to give any real review of the merit of Baez’s (or maybe it was Baden’s via Baez) argument, I was behooved to purchase this publication and give it a long night of getting through the relevant portions of the publication (the entire work being over 300 pages, and no – I did not read ALL of it, just the parts that were material to the subject). So after reading the applicable portions of this report, I will now give my interpretation as to whether the defense’s argument was a hit or miss.

The CliffsNotes version is: Miss. ( Just in case you don’t want to stick with me for the full version.)

Read more:
http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/06/02/concerning-the-junk-science-argument-against-vasss-work/

An analysis of Dr. Jawitz’s report

Posted on August 24th, 2010 by Valhall

As previously discussed here at The Hinky Meter, I passed Dr. Jawitz’s report to a wetland expert and asked that he provide an analysis of the soundness of the water level analysis and its conclusions. Brian McGowan, CWD, CCP agreed to review Dr. Jawitz’s report and has offered his learned opinion. The following are his conclusions after spending several months looking over the available data obtained from the Stormwater Management office of Orange County. (The same data Dr. Jawitz is assumed to have utilized in his analysis.)

******************************

After reviewing the hydrological report assembled by Dr. James W. Jawitz and dated November 3, 2009, I have come to the following conclusions:

I believe that the methods that Dr. Jawitz employed to measure the groundwater fluctuation at the investigation site are sound and scientifically accurate. I also believe that the data reflected in his report is a true measure of groundwater depth at the investigation site. This data can be accurately extrapolated to measure the groundwater fluctuations at Area A (the site in which the remains were found). Also, the topographic map that he uses on page 3 of his report was adapted from a recent survey dated January 30, 2009 which was conducted by Allen & company Professional Surveyors and Pampers. This topographic data was measured in 1 foot contours which allow a high level of interpretation as to the topography of area A.

Read more: http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/08/24/caylee-anthony-case-an-analysis-of-dr-jawitzs-report/

Brian McGowan’s bio

Dr. Jawitz’s water level analysis report