Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
+4
Piper
Estee
LottieM
Snaz
8 posters
Page 2 of 3
Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
Big Daddy! Spindy got a message on her phone (I think) & left the court room.
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
I wonder WHO it was from? I'm sure it was one of her many friends.
Dis- Posts : 1540
Join date : 2009-10-13
Age : 54
Location : Somewhere in fantasy land havin a blast with Jules and eva :)
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
Wonder if G hocked his earrings???
Estee- Posts : 6008
Join date : 2009-10-12
Age : 83
Location : Cozy little shack
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
He doesn't appear to have any black eyes......hehehe
Thanks for the pic, Fysty!!
Thanks for the pic, Fysty!!
Piper- Posts : 10277
Join date : 2009-07-12
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
Estee wrote:Wonder if G hocked his earrings???
Didn't use the money for his mortgage! LMAO
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
I wonder if he hocked them at the same place he hocked his pride...
Dis- Posts : 1540
Join date : 2009-10-13
Age : 54
Location : Somewhere in fantasy land havin a blast with Jules and eva :)
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
LOL Piper! Nope, No black eyes!
Dis- Posts : 1540
Join date : 2009-10-13
Age : 54
Location : Somewhere in fantasy land havin a blast with Jules and eva :)
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
Jean Casares(sp?) talking about the unsealed evidence!!!
Estee- Posts : 6008
Join date : 2009-10-12
Age : 83
Location : Cozy little shack
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
LottieM wrote:Does their new attorney seem a bit antagonistic, or is it just me?
It's not just you Lottie, they are all antagonistic! He doesn't look like KC's type...
Dis- Posts : 1540
Join date : 2009-10-13
Age : 54
Location : Somewhere in fantasy land havin a blast with Jules and eva :)
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
another live link
http://www.wftv.com/video/22875615/index.html
http://www.wftv.com/video/22875615/index.html
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
Does anyone know anything about this "Mason" dude??? Where's he from???Has he handled any earth shattering cases???
Estee- Posts : 6008
Join date : 2009-10-12
Age : 83
Location : Cozy little shack
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
Thanks Fysty! That one works much better!
Estee~He looks familiar to me.
Estee~He looks familiar to me.
Dis- Posts : 1540
Join date : 2009-10-13
Age : 54
Location : Somewhere in fantasy land havin a blast with Jules and eva :)
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
I posted in another thread, a couple of news stories that give more information on the new clown.
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
Also...secret document Judge unseals...
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22876651/detail.html
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22876634/detail.html
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22876651/detail.html
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22876634/detail.html
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
Thanks Fysty....
Estee- Posts : 6008
Join date : 2009-10-12
Age : 83
Location : Cozy little shack
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
Just a quick snippet....(http://www.wftv.com/news/22876305/detail.html)
“You do not come any larger than J Cheney Mason,” WFTV legal analyst Bill Sheaffer said.
Mason is one of the top defense attorney's in the country. He has tried 50 murder cases successfully and is a part of a number of anti-death penalty organizations.
“[Cheney] is a founding father of the Central Florida Criminal Defense Association,” WFTV legal analyst Bill Sheaffer told WFTV. “This is a game changer.”
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
I wonder if Jose has any "off shore" bank accounts?
Estee- Posts : 6008
Join date : 2009-10-12
Age : 83
Location : Cozy little shack
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
I just noticed that Judge Strickland's headrest sometimes makes him look like he's wearing large headphones!!!
Estee- Posts : 6008
Join date : 2009-10-12
Age : 83
Location : Cozy little shack
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
How do you attend a hearing and testify to things without bringing documents to back it up? Lyon and Baez appear to be pulling info from the air above their heads.
Dis- Posts : 1540
Join date : 2009-10-13
Age : 54
Location : Somewhere in fantasy land havin a blast with Jules and eva :)
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
They have nothing to back up what they say, I guess we should just trust them??
Dis- Posts : 1540
Join date : 2009-10-13
Age : 54
Location : Somewhere in fantasy land havin a blast with Jules and eva :)
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
Damn, it sure sounds like they have gotten a lot of money. IMO, and it's only MY opinion...if they have been offered money for book deals and/or movie deals...why not have them take THAT money instead of taxpayers paying for this skanky bitch? I mean, I don't think they should be allowed to make ANY money from Caylee's death, but it just seems to me that they will in the end anyway. Whey not make them USE that money for her defense & not allow her to just sit on a bankroll and buy her twinkie's in jail? It's sort of a catch 22 but IMO, she'll make money later (when the trial is over) anyway. Why not tell Bozo to take the damn deals & use that money instead???
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
LOL Estee! Or a hammerhead shark!
Get er done Strickland!
Get er done Strickland!
Dis- Posts : 1540
Join date : 2009-10-13
Age : 54
Location : Somewhere in fantasy land havin a blast with Jules and eva :)
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
Does Bozo look like the cowardly lion in the Wizard of Oz, or is it just me?
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
I hope that if this goes thru it prohibits everyone from $$ in the future!!!! Even after this case is finalized...
Estee- Posts : 6008
Join date : 2009-10-12
Age : 83
Location : Cozy little shack
Mood :
Dis- Posts : 1540
Join date : 2009-10-13
Age : 54
Location : Somewhere in fantasy land havin a blast with Jules and eva :)
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
How much has cousin IT recieved?
Dis- Posts : 1540
Join date : 2009-10-13
Age : 54
Location : Somewhere in fantasy land havin a blast with Jules and eva :)
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
Relying on someones WORD? Are you kidding me? I can't believe Strickland will go for this. I hope not anyway.
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
Who are they talking to?
Dis- Posts : 1540
Join date : 2009-10-13
Age : 54
Location : Somewhere in fantasy land havin a blast with Jules and eva :)
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
Not exactly sure Dis. There has been a problem hearing whoever it is, from the beginning. Hopefully there will be a transcript.
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
I have a feeling that this new guy is going to be GOOD for this case. Judge Strickland doesn't seem to be liking his BS much.
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
Jack is on the phone...said something about wanting KC to testify re this indigency under oath...Mason said in a few words...NO WAY
Estee- Posts : 6008
Join date : 2009-10-12
Age : 83
Location : Cozy little shack
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
Thanks Fysty! InSession is on PST so they are not even to the hearing yet. Still talking about fraud trial.
Dis- Posts : 1540
Join date : 2009-10-13
Age : 54
Location : Somewhere in fantasy land havin a blast with Jules and eva :)
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
Oh, do you mean JAC Estee? The agency that monitors indengency funds?
Dis- Posts : 1540
Join date : 2009-10-13
Age : 54
Location : Somewhere in fantasy land havin a blast with Jules and eva :)
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
Whoops...looks like Mason was thrown for a loop re getting Fl expert to set CAPS
Estee- Posts : 6008
Join date : 2009-10-12
Age : 83
Location : Cozy little shack
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
BTW...Estee...Just a few more days till I come to Florida. I am SO looking forward to meeting you in person! Haven't heard from KariBear. Please let her know I'll be there from Mar 23 to April 7th.
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
Yeah right Bozo! Shut Up!
Dis- Posts : 1540
Join date : 2009-10-13
Age : 54
Location : Somewhere in fantasy land havin a blast with Jules and eva :)
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
I noticed that Spindy tried to get a glimpse of KC as she was being led from the court room. KC on the other hand, never even looked their way.
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
I'll call Kari tonight ...I had sent her a PM, but she hasn't responded yet....
Estee- Posts : 6008
Join date : 2009-10-12
Age : 83
Location : Cozy little shack
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
ABC put $200,000 in a trust fund for Casey!
The fired attorney gave her $70,000!
$5000 from an anonymous donor!
That's 275 thou, minus the 110 admitted paid out, where is the other 95 thou?
The fired attorney gave her $70,000!
$5000 from an anonymous donor!
That's 275 thou, minus the 110 admitted paid out, where is the other 95 thou?
LottieM- Posts : 1725
Join date : 2010-03-01
Location : ridin' my bike....duh
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
That was the wierdest thing I have ever seen! kh
khintx- Posts : 4022
Join date : 2009-10-15
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
And that guy Mason seemed to think he and he alone could deem Casey 'obviously indigent"- What the heck???? kh
khintx- Posts : 4022
Join date : 2009-10-15
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
I agree, the defense came to this hearing without paperwork to support their case? They are still hiding something! What is it?
My biggie of the day!
Did you all catch Baez saying he was 'retained' by Casey on JUNE 17th? OK, just a misspeak, OR does this explain why he was readily available at the jail when Casey got arrested? There's always been confusion over just how Casey chose Baez! What if it wasn't a misspeak and he screwed up and told the truth by accident?
My biggie of the day!
Did you all catch Baez saying he was 'retained' by Casey on JUNE 17th? OK, just a misspeak, OR does this explain why he was readily available at the jail when Casey got arrested? There's always been confusion over just how Casey chose Baez! What if it wasn't a misspeak and he screwed up and told the truth by accident?
LottieM- Posts : 1725
Join date : 2010-03-01
Location : ridin' my bike....duh
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
Great point Lottie. He was certainly squirming. The entire dufense team found the whole morning very amusing. He brought this motion and brought no paperwork??? WTF??? kh
khintx- Posts : 4022
Join date : 2009-10-15
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
Wow, what a hearing. That was the strangest thing I have ever seen. I don't think Strickland was very amused though.
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
According to information provided by the State in a motion to block the
judge’s Thursday release of the evidence, “the Orange County Sheriff’s
Office was contacted by an inmate in the Florida Department of
Correction, who stated that she had communications with the Defendant
while in the Orange County Jail.”According to the State’s motion,
“that inmate was interviewed on or about the 22nd day of January 2010
and relayed potentially relevant statements by the Defendant, which are
not in the nature of a confession, and gave the name of another inmate
who also had communication with the Defendant. The second inmate,
presently incarcerated in Federal Prison, was interviewed on or about
the 27th day of January 2010 and reluctantly confirmed communication
with the Defendant adding that she had received approximately fifty
written communications from the Defendant which were then in the
possession of another individual whose identity was provided to the
Orange County Sheriffs Office.”The motion goes on to reveal that
the State believes “the documents ... appear to contain relevant
statements of the Defendant,” but do not include a confession.The
State continues, “In a subsequent the interview with F.D.L.E. on
February 12 2010, the federal inmate detailed how her friendship with
the Defendant began and developed, how the documents came into
existence, were transmitted and were maintained. She stated the
friendship and all communication ended when she was transferred to
federal custody. She stated that the friendship was not at the request
of any law enforcement personnel nor was she asked to relay any
information obtained to any law enforcement personnel. She did imply
that an Orange County Corrections officer may have facilitated the
communication once the friendship had begun but indicated a desire not
to ‘get anyone in trouble.’”The State’s motion asks for an
additional delay in the release of the documents, stating that “it is
anticipated that the investigation should be completed within the next
thirty days and that any premature revelation of these matters could
compromise the integrity of the investigation case.”
judge’s Thursday release of the evidence, “the Orange County Sheriff’s
Office was contacted by an inmate in the Florida Department of
Correction, who stated that she had communications with the Defendant
while in the Orange County Jail.”According to the State’s motion,
“that inmate was interviewed on or about the 22nd day of January 2010
and relayed potentially relevant statements by the Defendant, which are
not in the nature of a confession, and gave the name of another inmate
who also had communication with the Defendant. The second inmate,
presently incarcerated in Federal Prison, was interviewed on or about
the 27th day of January 2010 and reluctantly confirmed communication
with the Defendant adding that she had received approximately fifty
written communications from the Defendant which were then in the
possession of another individual whose identity was provided to the
Orange County Sheriffs Office.”The motion goes on to reveal that
the State believes “the documents ... appear to contain relevant
statements of the Defendant,” but do not include a confession.The
State continues, “In a subsequent the interview with F.D.L.E. on
February 12 2010, the federal inmate detailed how her friendship with
the Defendant began and developed, how the documents came into
existence, were transmitted and were maintained. She stated the
friendship and all communication ended when she was transferred to
federal custody. She stated that the friendship was not at the request
of any law enforcement personnel nor was she asked to relay any
information obtained to any law enforcement personnel. She did imply
that an Orange County Corrections officer may have facilitated the
communication once the friendship had begun but indicated a desire not
to ‘get anyone in trouble.’”The State’s motion asks for an
additional delay in the release of the documents, stating that “it is
anticipated that the investigation should be completed within the next
thirty days and that any premature revelation of these matters could
compromise the integrity of the investigation case.”
khintx- Posts : 4022
Join date : 2009-10-15
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
That inmate was interviewed on or about the 22nd day of January 2010 and
relayed potentially relevant statements by the Defendant, which are not in the
nature of a confession, and gave the name of another inmate who also had
communication with the Defendant.
3. The second inmate, presently incarcerated in Federal Prison, was interviewed
on or about the 27th day of January 2010 and reluctantly confirmed
communication with the Defendant adding that she had received approximately
fifty written communications from the Defendant which were then in the
possession of another individual whose identity was provided to the Orange
County Sheriffs Office.
(snip)
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22876634/detail.html
relayed potentially relevant statements by the Defendant, which are not in the
nature of a confession, and gave the name of another inmate who also had
communication with the Defendant.
3. The second inmate, presently incarcerated in Federal Prison, was interviewed
on or about the 27th day of January 2010 and reluctantly confirmed
communication with the Defendant adding that she had received approximately
fifty written communications from the Defendant which were then in the
possession of another individual whose identity was provided to the Orange
County Sheriffs Office.
(snip)
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22876634/detail.html
khintx- Posts : 4022
Join date : 2009-10-15
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
I'm going to go watch the hearing again khintx, but I paid attention after Jose said he was retained on JUNE 17 and Casey went into complete eyeball shock and didn't find anything humorous after that. Lyon looked a bit distracted as well after that remark.
I'm stuck on that slippage of Baez's! Caylee supposedly died on June 16th! If she actually did get Baez involved on June 17th that's very telling! He was right there at the jail house the day she was arrested - supposedly soliciting clients. I'm really thinking karma for Caylee has made Baez screw up and say JUNE 17th! Or maybe he didn't have a choice since he was put under oath in testimony!
I'm stuck on that slippage of Baez's! Caylee supposedly died on June 16th! If she actually did get Baez involved on June 17th that's very telling! He was right there at the jail house the day she was arrested - supposedly soliciting clients. I'm really thinking karma for Caylee has made Baez screw up and say JUNE 17th! Or maybe he didn't have a choice since he was put under oath in testimony!
LottieM- Posts : 1725
Join date : 2010-03-01
Location : ridin' my bike....duh
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
Lottie~ So- is this the other show that's gonna drop?! kh
khintx- Posts : 4022
Join date : 2009-10-15
Mood :
Re: Hearing - 3/18/10 Discussion - LOCKED
If anyone finds the complete hearing online, please post the link or embed it. Thanks in advance.
Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
» Hearing 6/1/10 - Discussion - LOCKED
» Hearing 7/2/10 - Discussion - LOCKED
» Hearing 7/15/10 - Discussion - LOCKED
» Status Hearing 10/29/10 - Discussion Only - LOCKED
» Status Hearing 11/29/10 - Discussion Only
» Hearing 7/2/10 - Discussion - LOCKED
» Hearing 7/15/10 - Discussion - LOCKED
» Status Hearing 10/29/10 - Discussion Only - LOCKED
» Status Hearing 11/29/10 - Discussion Only
Page 2 of 3
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum