Jodi Arias--Trial for the murder of Travis Alexander #26

Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer · 39s
Willmott and Flores quibble over an analogy in which she compares altering the computer with tearing a page out of a book in evidence.

https://twitter.com/michaelbkiefer

Computer problems so I am out of here.
Catch up later....

Katie Conner ‏@KatieJConner · 2m
Melendez testified: I did not see any virus on #TravisAlexander comp. Willmott: We know that's not true #JuanMartinez: Objection #JodiArias

https://twitter.com/KatieJConner

Steve Krafft @SKrafftFox10 · 55s
#jodiarias Det. Flores admits viruses found on Travis Alexander's computer.

https://twitter.com/SKrafftFox10

Steve Krafft @SKrafftFox10 · 59s
Det. Flores admits porn was found on computer. #jodiarias

https://twitter.com/SKrafftFox10

Steve Krafft @SKrafftFox10 · 49s
"venus monster anal #$%& machine" was title of one video found on Travis Alexander's computer, Det. Flores admits. #jodiarias

https://twitter.com/SKrafftFox10

Michael Kiefer retweeted
Monica Lindstrom @monicalindstrom · 4m
JS is asking Flores questions to get out that Melendez testified multiple times there was no pornography on the computer #JodiArias

https://twitter.com/michaelbkiefer

Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer   ·  2m    
Martinez: "Unless the Holy Ghost comes down on the scene it's always going to contaminate it."


Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer   ·  2m    
Martinez starts cross-examination. Says it was not a "pristine crime scene." Alexander's friends were through it and changed the scene.


Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer   ·  3m  
Flores adds, "Just like the defense experts didn't find pornography either."


Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer   ·  4m    
Now Willmott reads Nurmi's questions to Melendez during cross examination during this trial in which Melendez again denied presence of porn.


More ...

https://twitter.com/michaelbkiefer

Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer · 4m
Flores: "I'm just there to keep them from taking the evidence out of the room."


Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer · 4m
Martinez recreates the 2009 defense examination of the computer. "They plugged it in," Flores said.


Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer · 6m
Martinez asks if procedure at the time was to wake computers. "That's what I did."


Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer  ·  9m    
Martinez shows a photo of Alexander's den and the computer on the desk. Flores agrees that in 2008 Mesa PD had different policy.


More ...

https://twitter.com/michaelbkiefer

Michael Kiefer retweeted
Mike Watkiss @mikewatkiss3tv  ·  4m  
Martinez again spitting mad-firing questions at Det Flores-again trying to imply previous Defense modifies TA's computer#jodiarias #3tvarias


Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer  ·  4m  
Martinez leads questioning to show that Flores and Melendez filed separate reports without synchronizing their stories.


Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer  ·  5m    
Martinez notes that defense could have found porn back in 2009, but didn't.


Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer  ·  6m  
Stephens sustains objection and asks jury to disregard last question accusing defense of altering computer. Martinez goes right back to it.


Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer  ·  7m  
Martinez demands yes/no answers from Flores. Shouts his accusation that defense modified information on computer. Objection. sidebar

More ...

https://twitter.com/michaelbkiefer

Michael Kiefer @michaelbkiefer · 53s
We are told that the transcripts of #Jodiarias' secret testimony will be released at noon Tuesday.

https://twitter.com/michaelbkiefer

Katie Conner @KatieJConner   ·  6m  
Lunch recess for #JodiArias trial #abc15

https://twitter.com/KatieJConner

Are you kidding me here? Why is this even being being discussed with this jury? This was supposed to be a penalty phase! JA has already been found guilty of 1st degree premeditated murder!

THE TRUTH ABOUT THE PORN PART TWO -- A Case of Violating The Duty Of Candor

http://jodiariastrialtruth.blogspot.com/

Weeziethm wrote:THE TRUTH ABOUT THE PORN PART TWO -- A Case of Violating The Duty Of Candor

http://jodiariastrialtruth.blogspot.com/

Powerful site. Thanks for the share!

".....THE MYSTERY BEHIND THE REFUSED IMAGE
more attempts to impede
Remember the raw untouched image JM asked for again and again? He received "Tony's" drive and then he kept receiving the work drives instead of the original image. JM was forced to rely on the defense for a 2014 copy of the hard drive because once they finished with it, the hard drive could no longer be accessed. The 2008 hard image cannot be used to inspect BN's work on the 2014 image. There was no way to verify it was the same as the one BN started with. And, it's not the same. JM needs to see for himself how, where, and when those 70,000 files were zero'd out. He needs to make sure nothing was added, changed, and then incinerated after the fact. He can't do this unless he can see the 2014 image BN made. The judge ordered BN to turn over the original image several times. He was to turn it over before the hearing. And once again at the end of day 2 of the hearing. Hearing day three started a week later, and BN still did not turn over the raw untouched image he worked off of. And, once again he was told to turn it over.


JM" He (BN) said he had a compressed image and was asked to turn it over. He was asked to do so last Friday and still has not done so."


It is unclear if BN ever turned over the original image. His story kept changing as to why. In the end, he claimed it was an attorney work copy. However, even the judge told him it was not what he stated before. And, it was not:

.JM: You went to the Mesa PD and created 3 clones?
BN: 2 of the compaq presario (Travis's computer) and 1 of the other.
BN I made an image of the drive

EXCUSES MADE FOR NOT TURNING OVER THE IMAGE
The grabbed the wrong one excuse
Tony Klump is the person who used FTK. When he made the first clone, the FTK grabbed the wrong image.(The Tony clone)

The "Tony did it excuse
"BN says he’s already provided a copy of the clone he worked on. But he didn’t provide a clone of the first time he imaged it-
JM- In order to conduct a test, we need exactly what he used to arrive at his conclusions (THE UNTOUCHED IMAGE) BN-I already turned it over. I didn’t verify it myself. Mr. Klump said it’s an exact clone of the second clone. BUT IT WAS NOT THE UNTOUCHED IMAGE

The "I won't be home excuse"
BN was leaving for a capital case on Sunday so he didn't have time.
JM didn't believe him and said "verify it"
JSS said "Just do it on Weds 11/26 when you return"

DECEMBER 4th - BN was ordered to make an image on 11/26. But he did not.

THE IMAGE IS COMPRESSED SO NOT USEFUL EXCUSE
JM wants to know why the image wasn’t turned over.
JM says the court’s order was to turn over image
BN The image is compressed

THE USE YOUR OWN EXCUSE
(argued multiple times)
JM wants a copy of the exact image that BN took–not BN's work product
JW They’re asking for something they already have (NO, they have a 2008 image, they want the 2014 untouched image DT made)

THE IMAGE IS ENCRYPTED EXCUSE
BN I made an image of the drive. The image is encrypted. First visit was an image–compressed file.
JM Your image has not been copied and turned over to the state?
Judge orders him to copy it
BN says fine–but it’s encrypted and you won’t be able to open it. A code is needed to open it.

THE USE LONNIE'S DRIVE EXCUSEJM: I want an exact image of your compressed image that can be unencrypted
BN: I don’t see what possible reason you want this because everything you could possibly want is on the drive that you gave Lonny.

THE IMAGES ARE GOING TO TAKE AWHILE EXCUSE
Judge wants BN to provide the images
JW doesn’t know when they can be available. It takes several hours to make an image.

THE IT'S AN ATTORNEY WORK COPY EXCUSE"
We interviewed BN. He did not refuse to turn over the encrypted copy. That copy is not an image of the hard drive. It’s a specific request to go into certain files the defense was interested in. It’s our belief that it’s work product because it highlighted what we’re interested in. The State does not need it. They have their own copies of the images. It’s not that BN refused; it’s that we believed it is work copy."
And, it was with that excuse the Judge said "BS". She pointed out it is not the same claim BN made previously. A transcript of the interview between BN and the DT was requested. It was not available. The DT was supposed to provide the Judge with an audio recording of the interview in which BN stated the image was an attorney work copy. They needed some time to get it together. The outcome of the inquiry is unknown. However, it leaves me wondering something. Can a recorded conversation really be verified as to happening on a given day? Or, could someone go back and re-record it to make it fit better with past statements in an attempt to cover up a lie? Bryan Neumeister is an audio visual forensic specialist..... Interesting thought.....

It is still unknown if the State ever received the raw untouched 2014 image made. However, with so much effort put in via the defense to avoid giving it, it's highly unlikely it was provided. So many excuses can only make a person go "hmmmmm?" One can't help but to wonder why the original image was not shared after the hard drive was broken. It's obvious there is a reason beyond the multiple excuses given, but what is it?

Did the DT fail to make an image before they started their investigation and then broke the hard drive? If so, it is very bad for DT as it reduces the credibility of the witness. After all, an expert understands the first thing that is done before a computer exam is to immortalize the data on record. It also looks very bad for a forensic specialist to make such a mistake. It puts a black strike on his business resume. The failure to preserve the evidence prior to beginning would be an error in the best interest of all to hide; especially if the witness states "the number one rule is to change nothing."


Perhaps it is because there is something which only shows on the 2014 original image which shows the DT claim of State misconduct or "lots of porn" is complete BS.

Or, is there something on the 2014 image which was doctored to make more or all of the malware related porn look like user associated porn and then incinerated?

But maybe it was just a delay tactic in order to prolong the hearing so the charges of prosecutorial misconduct would impede JM's ability to cross-examine the witness.

The only way the answer can be given is if the DT shares that 2014 image -- if one was ever made that is.


The defense delayed and possibly never even provided the untouched raw image. JM can't make his own because the drive was not functional when returned. It means the only way he can do his own investigation is by using those work drives BN turned over. But, the defense is now attempting to stop him from doing that as well. ......."

This is the reason we were slow to return to court in January:

".....The defense had purposely tried to make sure JM would not be prepared to cross-examine the witness. However, in the end they lost out. JM struck back with a motion to preclude JS as a witness or give the prosecutor more time to prepare. JS was present Jan 5th for trial so instead of testimony, JM was given the opportunity for an appropriate interview. There was no way the DT could get out of it. Court for January 5th was postponed until Jan 8th to give JM extra time to prepare. He wanted a week; he only got 4 days. ...."

http://jodiariastrialtruth.blogspot.com/

"..... Additionally,  once again the State would have had no motive to hide sexual texts.  Jodi did not change her defense until June of 2010.  This was after the whole text fiasco Nurmi invented.  June 22, 2010 is when she officially changed her defense to assert self-defense with sexual undertones.  The State had no motive to withhold sexual messages because there was no sex relation to the crime at the time of the allegations. It's a fact the defense purposefully chooses to overlook time and time again. ...."


http://jodiariastrialtruth.blogspot.com/


"....The DT implied TA went to 1000's of porn sites when the only possible user access was on one day, June 1st, and for only 45 minutes. ...."

Here. Det. Flores is telling JA how they make copies of the camera/hard drive. Says they take an image or a copy (of the hard drive) and they never touch the original again:
1:35:00

So, is there court tomorrow?

Moosiesmama wrote:So, is there court tomorrow?  

The judge dismissed the jury today until Wednesday at 10:00 AM.

Thanks, AD.

I am not setting a high expectation for anything explosive to come out in the transcripts today.....JA did not testify for very long before the plug was pulled on secret testimony. I am betting that she was laying some kind of fanciful foundation for a bombshell lie when the super secret trial was halted.... halted before she got to spin her entire tale.... bwahahahahahaha.

And, IMO, it was important for her to get the entire sh*t tale exposed so that Geffner could somehow reinforce her lies with some gobble-de-gook. And that did not happen.

Guess we will see around noon today. Perhaps. Maybe. Dunno!

Also, saw on Jen's Trial Diaries that the transcripts are now costing between $1000 and $1500 up from the earlier figure of $400.

This b*tch needs to go away.

Weeziethm wrote:I am not setting a high expectation for anything explosive to come out in the transcripts today.....JA did not testify for very long before the plug was pulled on secret testimony.  I am betting that she was laying some kind of fanciful foundation for a bombshell lie when the super secret trial was halted.... halted before she got to spin her entire tale....  bwahahahahahaha.  

And, IMO, it was important for her to get the entire sh*t tale exposed so that Geffner could somehow reinforce her lies with some gobble-de-gook.  And that did not happen.

Guess we will see around noon today.  Perhaps.  Maybe.  Dunno!

Also, saw on Jen's Trial Diaries that the transcripts are now costing between $1000 and $1500 up from the earlier figure of $400.

This b*tch needs to go away.

Big media will pick that up in a flash.
Should be able to read that over at AZ newspaper later today.... IF they are released!
Exciting day, all in all.

EDITED:
Thinking media MAY counter-sue as the records should NOT have been locked down in secrecy to begin with!

Stephen S ‏@LoverBoyStephen 7m7 minutes ago

OH no No court Wed on #jodiarias JSS just sent out the message UM just kidding with all of u

https://twitter.com/hashtag/jodiarias?f=realtime&src=hash

IMO, might be at the request of Juan M so he may prepare for deposing/court on Thursday. I am sure DT will try to pull JA from being crossed and JM should be up with his motions.... can't unring that bell before the jury!

...am also prepared for a REDACTED transcript, imo

watacatch ‏@Pinkzzer 1m1 minute ago

According to Beth Karas #jodiarias transcripts cost $576, she will get hers from media attorney and post it on her subscription website

https://twitter.com/hashtag/jodiarias?f=realtime&src=hash

Weeziethm wrote:...am also prepared for a REDACTED transcript, imo

Yeah. Word on twitter is there are only 144 pages to be released of OVER 400 pages.
Rather condensed for TWO days of her ramblings.

Latest/live from FOX in AZ:




REPORTER STEVE KRAFFT WILL BE BACK AT 3 PM AZ TIME TO GIVE INFO ON THE TESTIMONY FROM THE DOCS.
USE LINK ABOVE.

Interesting site. Informative.

https://twitter.com/starknightz

Bobby Wilbert ‏@bobbyw24 2m2 minutes ago
Judge postpones decision on death penalty
#JodiArias trial: - WNEM TV 5 - WNEM Saginaw - http://ln.is/www.wnem.com/story/2/q5VWq …

https://twitter.com/hashtag/jodiarias?f=realtime&src=hash

Published on Feb 14, 2013

Clip from 48 Hours interview in 2008, not aired during broadcast, on why she is smiling in her mugshot.
1707 days after Travis Alexander's death, Arias took the witness stand in her first degree murder trial and admitted killing Travis, she is now claiming self defense.

JA stated on/about Jan 16, 2008, she had left Travis only to return and find him masturbating to an image of a young male. She said it was a picture on the bed; she said it was from the computer.

1. NO evidence of ANY child porn (male/female) from computer.
2. NO evidence of ANY porn from the computer in JANUARY 2008.

I really hope Juan brings this info BACK to the jury.
It IS evidence she lied. Again. And again. And Again...

Dave Erickson ‏@ericksonvision 2m2 minutes ago

I'll post snippets from the secret #JodiArias testimony in a bit. I can say its about her life and childhood, doesn't talk about Travis.

https://twitter.com/hashtag/jodiarias?f=realtime&src=hash

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 3m3 minutes ago

I've got transcripts of the secret #jodiarias testimony. I will let you know what's in them. Word is, nothing new.

https://twitter.com/hashtag/jodiarias?f=realtime&src=hash

Transcripts are now out.
MK. above, is reporter who supports JA.
I will wait for comment from others less biased.

The Gold Patrol™ ‏@thegoldpatrol 2m2 minutes ago

#jodiarias according to sources, transcript talks about her life and childhood and not Travis


https://twitter.com/thegoldpatrol

3TV News Desk ‏@3tvnewsdesk 2m2 minutes ago

BREAKING: #3TV has obtained #JodiArias secret testimony. @mikewatkiss3tv will have the all the details on #GEAZ.

Here Travis says he "loved the braids" JA wore.
Explains why she wore them when she murdered him.
@26:10

HERE IS THE START OF TRANSCRIPT:

https://twitter.com/thegoldpatrol



talk about how stupid she was in interrogation videos & what the lying did to people. She wishes she could have a do over.
(TDoggAngels ‏@Angels_Dwell 2m2 minutes ago

Those gas cans & weapons she took with her DO NOT show remorse Actions speak louder than words)

wishes she could take away all the hurt caused to everyone from what she did. Including Travis.

(Pat Snow ‏@Mdwestgal 1m1 minute ago

@thegoldpatrol And since #JodiArias trip to Ryan was set up BEFORE she went to AZ, she admits PREMEDITATION! woohoo NOT self defense! https://twitter.com/hashtag/jodiarias?f=realtime&src=hash)


talks about how writing was interesting to her from a young age.

admits her intention with visiting Ryan Burns after killing Travis was to act normal - and make it seem she’d never been to AZ

admits that leaving voicemail on Travis’s phone was an attempt to cover her tracks.

asked about photography interest becoming more.
Jodi explains that she went digital after moving to Palm Desert.

Q about being romantically involved with Darryl Brewer.
A: We were involved. We went to our own rooms.

Q: Why did it take so long for you 2 admit 2 yourself?
A: What I did was so horrifying i couldn’t have imagined myself doing that to another human being


Q: Why did it take you 2 years to admit it?
A: It took me that long to admit that I did it - to myself.”


#jodiarias transcript. Question #3. “Did you kill Travis Alexander”
Jodi - “Yes I admitted that in 2010.”


________________________________________________
James Apalategui ‏@PhxPhotogJames 2m2 minutes ago

#jodiarias transcripts hot off the press! @mikewatkiss3tv will break it down for you this afternoon on @3TVNews!

TDoggAngels ‏@Angels_Dwell 2m2 minutes ago

Those gas cans & weapons she took with her DO NOT show remorse Actions speak louder than words

https://twitter.com/hashtag/jodiarias?f=realtime&src=hash


IMO, the ONLY thing JA is sorry about is that she got caught!
Had she not gotten caught, there would have been NO remorse at all.
She is sorry she could not outsmart the detectives, Travis' friends, etc..

William Pitts ‏@william_pitts 1m1 minute ago

We'll be posting the full #JodiArias transcript on @azcentral at noon (or pretty close). #12news

The Gold Patrol™ ‏@thegoldpatrol 1m1 minute ago

#jodiarias says in retrospect sending Travis grandmother flowers was insensitive but at the time to her doing nothing would be worse.

https://twitter.com/hashtag/jodiarias?f=realtime&src=hash

The Gold Patrol™ ‏@thegoldpatrol 1m1 minute ago

@ericksonvision: The first 14 pages of the 10/30 #JodiArias secret testimony is her expressing "remorse" the rest is childhood backstory

https://twitter.com/hashtag/jodiarias?f=realtime&src=hash

So far, nothing new.
So why closed court?
We have heard this all before.
Why were her family excluded?

Remorse.
She is faking that crap.
She is trying to appeal to the jury.
BTW, last pic of her in court? She had on eyeliner above and below the eyelid; brow pencil, pinkish lipstick... SHE IS A FELON! What right does she have to wear this crap?

TESTIMONY HERE!

http://www.azfamily.com/home/Transcript-of-Jodi-Arias-testimony-released-288430941.html?ref

http://media2.abc15.com/html/pdf/ariastestimonynovember3.pdf

Oct, 30, 2014 144 pages

http://archive.azcentral.com/ic/pdf/arias-transcript.pdf


Nov 3, 2014 105 pages
http://media2.abc15.com/html/pdf/ariastestimonynovember3.pdf

Secret Jodi Arias transcripts released to media

Michael Kiefer, The Republic | azcentral.com 12:05 p.m. MST January 13, 2015

Jodi Arias got right to the point.

On the third question of her secret testimony Oct. 30, after asking her name and if she had been convicted of murder, Arias' defense attorney, Jennifer Willmott, laid it out.

READ: The transcript from Oct. 30, 2014 testimony

READ: The transcript from Nov. 3, 2014 testimony

RELATED: Appeals court: Jodi Arias testimony must be made public

Read more:

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/mesa/2015/01/13/jodi-arias-testimony-transcripts-released/21695559/

The Gold Patrol™ ‏@thegoldpatrol 1m1 minute ago

#jodiarias SECRET testimony on http://www.thegoldpatrol.com NOW. Click link to download file

One day is 144 pages, the 2nd is 105 pages. I started to read it, but stopped

That. Is. All.

Hi Weeziethm,

There is absolutely nothing new in the transcripts, the entire thing is nothing more than media hype to sensationalize Jodi's "secret testimony". But, to be fair, as you have stated before, the plug was pulled before she began  "to weave her web and to spin her tales". This trial is a circus.